We will never recover’, Lilie James’ parents tell murder inquest as experts describe ex-boyfriend’s coercive control in 2025.
Table of Contents
The inquest into the murder of Lilie James has revealed disturbing details about the coercive control exerted by her ex-boyfriend, Paul Thijssen. The court heard how Thijssen stalked and manipulated James, leading to her tragic death. Her family expressed their profound grief, stating they will never recover from the loss. The inquest aims to shed light on the dynamics of domestic violence and the impact of coercive control on victims. For more detailed information, you can refer to the articles linked in the search results. Overview of the Inquest
The inquest into Lilie James’ murder has highlighted the severe impact of coercive control in domestic violence situations.
- Victim’s Background: Lilie James was a 21-year-old water polo coach, described by her parents as beautiful, intelligent, and full of life.
- Perpetrator’s Actions: Paul Thijssen, her ex-boyfriend, engaged in manipulative behaviors, including stalking and gaslighting, as she attempted to end their relationship.
Parental Testimony
Lilie’s parents, Peta and Jamie James, shared their heart-wrenching experiences during the inquest.
- Emotional Impact: They expressed that the loss of their daughter is something they will never recover from, emphasizing the need for societal change in how young boys are taught to respect women.
- Call to Action: They urged for education that instills respect for women’s choices and opinions to prevent future tragedies.
Details of Coercive Control We will never
Experts at the inquest provided insights into the nature of Thijssen’s control over James.
- Manipulative Tactics: Thijssen’s behavior included emotional abuse, where he attempted to erase James’s sense of self and autonomy.
- Stalking Behavior: The court heard about multiple instances of physical stalking and aggressive confrontations, illustrating the escalating nature of his control.
Expert Testimonies
Key testimonies from domestic violence experts shed light on the psychological aspects of coercive control.
- Kate Fitz-Gibbon: Director of the Monash Gender and Family Violence Prevention Centre, highlighted how Thijssen’s loss of control in other areas of his life may have triggered his violent actions.
- Anna Butler: Manager of the NSW domestic violence death review team, noted that James was trying to set boundaries, which Thijssen resisted through manipulative tactics.
Technology-Facilitated Abuse Technology-Facilitated Abuse
The inquest also discussed the role of technology in Thijssen’s coercive control.
- Digital Stalking: Fitz-Gibbon pointed out that Thijssen used apps like Snapchat to track James’s location, exemplifying modern forms of abuse.
- Fake Accounts: The creation of a fake Snapchat account to manipulate and control James was a significant factor leading up to her murder.
Conclusion of the Inquest
The inquest into Lilie James’ murder serves as a critical examination of the dynamics of domestic violence and the devastating effects of coercive control.
- Awareness and Education: The testimonies and findings aim to raise awareness about the signs of coercive control and the importance of educating young people on healthy relationships.
- Legacy of Lilie James: Her parents’ heartfelt messages and the expert insights aim to honor her memory by advocating for change in societal attitudes towards domestic violence.
The inquest into the murder of Lilie James has revealed disturbing details about the coercive control exerted by her ex-boyfriend, Paul Thijssen. The court heard how Thijssen stalked and manipulated James, leading to her tragic death. Her family expressed their profound grief, stating they will never recover from the loss. The inquest aims to shed light on the dynamics of domestic violence and the impact of coercive control on victims. For more detailed information, you can refer to the articles linked in the search results. Overview of the Inquest
The inquest into Lilie James’ murder has highlighted the severe impact of coercive control in domestic violence situations.
- Victim’s Background: Lilie James was a 21-year-old water polo coach, described by her parents as beautiful, intelligent, and full of life.
- Perpetrator’s Actions: Paul Thijssen, her ex-boyfriend, engaged in manipulative behaviors, including stalking and gaslighting, as she attempted to end their relationship.
Parental Testimony
Lilie’s parents, Peta and Jamie James, shared their heart-wrenching experiences during the inquest.
- Emotional Impact: They expressed that the loss of their daughter is something they will never recover from, emphasizing the need for societal change in how young boys are taught to respect women.
- Call to Action: They urged for education that instills respect for women’s choices and opinions to prevent future tragedies.
Details of Coercive Control
Experts at the inquest provided insights into the nature of Thijssen’s control over James.
- Manipulative Tactics: Thijssen’s behavior included emotional abuse, where he attempted to erase James’s sense of self and autonomy.
- Stalking Behavior: The court heard about multiple instances of physical stalking and aggressive confrontations, illustrating the escalating nature of his control.
We will never
Expert Testimonies We will never
Key testimonies from domestic violence experts shed light on the psychological aspects of coercive control.
- Kate Fitz-Gibbon: Director of the Monash Gender and Family Violence Prevention Centre, highlighted how Thijssen’s loss of control in other areas of his life may have triggered his violent actions.
- Anna Butler: Manager of the NSW domestic violence death review team, noted that James was trying to set boundaries, which Thijssen resisted through manipulative tactics.
Technology-Facilitated Abuse
The inquest also discussed the role of technology in Thijssen’s coercive control.
- Digital Stalking: Fitz-Gibbon pointed out that Thijssen used apps like Snapchat to track James’s location, exemplifying modern forms of abuse.
- Fake Accounts: The creation of a fake Snapchat account to manipulate and control James was a significant factor leading up to her murder.
Conclusion of the Inquest
The inquest into Lilie James’ murder serves as a critical examination of the dynamics of domestic violence and the devastating effects of coercive control.
- Awareness and Education: The testimonies and findings aim to raise awareness about the signs of coercive control and the importance of educating young people on healthy relationships.
- Legacy of Lilie James: Her parents’ heartfelt messages and the expert insights aim to honor her memory by advocating for change in societal attitudes towards domestic violence.
