
Vikram Misri
Table of Contents
Vikram Misri, the Indian diplomat and former ambassador to China, has always been known for his pragmatic approach to foreign policy, especially when dealing with a complex and sometimes contentious relationship between India and China. His words, “The path forward may be difficult, but we are prepared to walk,” reflect the deep understanding of the challenges that both nations face in managing their bilateral relations while acknowledging that dialogue, cooperation, and compromise are the way forward despite the differences.
India and China share a long history that is both rich and complex, with several periods of cooperation and conflict. Their relationship is influenced by a variety of factors, from geographical proximity to geopolitical competition, cultural exchanges, and economic interests. Despite their long history of engagement, the relationship has often been fraught with tensions, especially in recent years, with the two countries dealing with several contentious issues, including border disputes, trade imbalances, and strategic rivalry.
A Challenging Relationship
Misri’s statement encapsulates the essence of the India-China relationship. Despite being the world’s most populous nations and having a shared interest in regional stability, they face deep-rooted issues that have made their relationship more challenging. Border disputes, particularly the ongoing tensions over the Line of Actual Control (LAC) in the Himalayas, have been a consistent source of friction. The 2020 Galwan Valley clash, in which soldiers from both countries lost their lives, highlighted the volatility and fragility of the peace along the border. Since then, the relationship has become more cautious, with both countries emphasizing security concerns and maintaining a delicate balance between dialogue and military preparedness.
Beyond the border issue, there is the matter of strategic competition. China’s growing influence in South Asia and the Indian Ocean region through its Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) has been viewed with suspicion in India. India, on the other hand, is increasingly aligned with other democracies in the Indo-Pacific, which has further raised concerns in Beijing. The rivalry for influence in regional and global institutions, such as the United Nations, has also created a sense of competition rather than cooperation.
Economically, while China is India’s largest trading partner, the trade deficit has been a longstanding issue. India imports significantly more from China than it exports, leading to calls from some quarters to reduce dependence on Chinese goods. This economic imbalance complicates the diplomatic relationship, as both countries recognize the need for economic cooperation but are often at odds over how to balance trade and investment.
The Importance of Dialogue

Vikram Misri’s comment underscores the need for continued dialogue and diplomatic engagement. Despite the differences, India and China share significant stakes in maintaining regional peace and stability. The economic ties between the two countries are too important to be overshadowed by their strategic rivalry. Trade, investment, and infrastructure development provide opportunities for cooperation, and despite the competitive dynamics, there are areas of mutual interest.
For example, both countries have expressed interest in working together on global issues like climate change and pandemic response. The global push towards sustainable development provides common ground for cooperation. Additionally, both India and China face similar challenges in terms of infrastructure development, technology, and the digital economy, which could offer avenues for collaboration.
Misri’s emphasis on the difficulty of the path forward highlights the reality that the relationship will not be smooth sailing. However, he also implies that there is a willingness to engage, acknowledging that challenges are inherent in any relationship, particularly one as complex as that between India and China. It is clear that India recognizes the importance of engaging with China, not just as a regional neighbor but as a global power with which it must find ways to coexist and cooperate.
The Role of Leadership
Leadership will play a key role in shaping the future of India-China relations. Both countries are under the leadership of strong political figures—Prime Minister Narendra Modi in India and President Xi Jinping in China—who have shown a commitment to asserting their respective countries’ positions on the world stage. However, both leaders also understand that cooperation is essential for their nations’ long-term stability and prosperity.
For India, the challenge is balancing its relations with China while preserving its sovereignty and security concerns. Prime Minister Modi has pursued a foreign policy that emphasizes “Act East” and strategic autonomy, seeking to ensure India remains independent in its foreign relations while also building stronger ties with like-minded democracies. At the same time, Modi’s government has been cautious in dealing with China, particularly after the Galwan Valley clash, and has emphasized strengthening India’s defense capabilities along the border.
On the Chinese side, President Xi Jinping has taken a more assertive stance in both domestic and foreign policy, which includes a focus on expanding China’s influence globally. However, Xi also understands the importance of economic cooperation and stability in maintaining China’s rise as a global power. For China, India is an important partner in ensuring regional stability and continuing economic growth, even as it seeks to assert its position on the world stage.
Looking Ahead: Cooperation and Competition
The future of India-China relations will likely be a mix of cooperation and competition. In areas like trade, technology, and infrastructure, the two countries will continue to engage with one another. However, their strategic competition in the Indo-Pacific, as well as issues like border security, will remain a constant challenge. Misri’s statement that the path forward may be difficult is a recognition of these challenges but also an acknowledgment that the relationship is far from doomed.
India and China must find a way to manage their differences without allowing them to derail the broader potential for cooperation. Multilateral forums such as the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), BRICS, and the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB) provide platforms for dialogue and cooperation, even as both countries navigate their competition.
In conclusion, Vikram Misri’s words reflect the reality of India-China relations: a recognition of the difficulties ahead but also an understanding that continued engagement and dialogue are essential. Both countries must walk a difficult path, but it is one that is necessary for regional stability, economic prosperity, and the pursuit of shared global goals. While challenges remain, the potential for cooperation in addressing common issues should not be overlooked, as both nations will continue to play a pivotal role in shaping the future of Asia and the world.