Trump
Table of Contents
Trump’s Tariff Threat: Turning Two of the World’s Biggest Foes into Friends
In the high-stakes world of global trade and geopolitics, it is not uncommon for nations to find themselves on opposing sides, both economically and diplomatically. Yet, in the case of the U.S. under President Donald Trump’s tariff policies, something unusual has occurred. Two of the world’s largest and most prominent geopolitical adversaries—China and the European Union (EU)—have found themselves moving toward a form of cooperation in the face of common threats. Trump’s imposition of tariffs, particularly on steel, aluminum, and a variety of Chinese goods, created a ripple effect in international trade, pushing rivals into a temporary alliance of convenience.
The Trump Tariff Strategy
When President Donald Trump took office in 2017, one of the cornerstones of his economic agenda was to implement tariffs as a way of reshaping global trade. He viewed these tariffs as necessary to address what he perceived as unfair trade practices by countries like China, which, according to the Trump administration, engaged in intellectual property theft, currency manipulation, and unfair subsidies. The imposition of tariffs, particularly on Chinese goods, was meant to level the playing field and encourage American companies to keep their operations domestically.
Trump also clashed with longstanding allies like the European Union, instituting tariffs on steel and aluminum from Europe, arguing that these imports posed a threat to U.S. national security. This was seen as an escalation of tensions, with countries that had been partners in various international organizations for decades now being treated as economic adversaries. Yet, the same tariffs that were intended to bolster American interests inadvertently pushed two of the world’s largest trading powers—China and the EU—closer together.
The European Union’s Reaction
The European Union, historically a staunch ally of the United States, found itself facing an unanticipated challenge with Trump’s protectionist policies. The decision to impose tariffs on steel and aluminum imports, ostensibly based on national security concerns, angered many European leaders. The EU’s reaction was swift and forceful, implementing retaliatory tariffs on American goods ranging from motorcycles to bourbon.
However, Trump’s actions also served to highlight a shared interest between the EU and China. Both were being targeted by the United States in ways that threatened their respective economic interests. For the EU, this was a particularly difficult position, as Europe’s economic model had long been predicated on an open and free global trading system, one in which the U.S. had been a key pillar.
For China, the situation was similarly dire. Trump’s tariffs on Chinese goods, which began with an initial focus on intellectual property issues and quickly expanded into a full-blown trade war, left China with few options but to respond in kind. In essence, China was fighting a two-front battle: one with the U.S. and the other with its own domestic economic challenges, such as slowing growth and rising internal debt.
China and the EU Find Common Ground
Though these two global players—China and the EU—had long been political and economic rivals, Trump’s tariff policy provided the impetus for them to find common ground. In 2018, as tensions escalated, China and the EU began engaging in direct dialogues and discussions aimed at minimizing the impact of U.S. tariffs. European leaders, especially from Germany, were particularly keen to avoid further destabilization of the global economic order. Meanwhile, China, facing a standoff with the U.S., saw in Europe a potential ally to both balance U.S. economic influence and work out solutions to trade disputes.
One of the most significant outcomes of this rapprochement was the establishment of a formal economic dialogue between China and the EU. In July 2020, the two sides completed negotiations on a landmark trade agreement—the EU-China Comprehensive Agreement on Investment (CAI). This deal, which had been in the works for several years, aimed to open up China’s markets to European companies in a way that was designed to be mutually beneficial. While not without its criticisms—particularly regarding human rights and China’s growing political influence—it was a clear sign of growing cooperation.
The EU also took steps to limit its exposure to potential U.S. economic pressures, forging closer ties with China, particularly in sectors like technology, renewable energy, and finance. For instance, China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), aimed at creating infrastructure links between China and Europe, was seen as a strategic opportunity for both sides. Though the EU did not fully embrace the BRI, it did see significant value in working with China on certain joint ventures, particularly those aligned with European interests in sustainability and climate change.
The Benefits of Cooperation
As the EU and China moved closer together, the results of their cooperation became evident. In 2019, trade between the EU and China grew significantly, with China becoming the EU’s largest trading partner, surpassing the U.S. for the first time. For China, the EU represented an economic powerhouse that could help offset the negative effects of U.S. tariffs. For the EU, aligning with China provided a way to preserve its global economic standing and safeguard against the fallout from Trump’s protectionist agenda.
This partnership was not just about trade; it was also about shaping the future global order. Both the EU and China understood that the global system was shifting, and that U.S. unilateralism—embodied by Trump’s tariff threats—was destabilizing. For China, working with the EU provided a way to hedge against the risk of further isolation, while for the EU, it was an opportunity to maintain access to one of the world’s largest and most dynamic economies.
A Temporary Alliance
It is important to note, however, that the partnership between the EU and China is not without its complexities. There are numerous points of contention, from human rights issues to political freedoms, where the two sides continue to disagree. Europe remains deeply concerned about China’s growing influence in global affairs, particularly in Africa and the Pacific, and about the rise of authoritarianism within China’s political system.
Furthermore, while trade between the EU and China has grown, both sides continue to watch the other warily, especially in light of the ever-shifting dynamics of international trade and the looming question of how the U.S. will respond under a future administration.
Still, the tariff wars initiated by Trump have pushed these two powerful players to reconsider their global strategies. The mutual recognition that the U.S. was taking an increasingly aggressive and isolationist approach to trade has pushed both China and the EU to set aside some of their differences and work together to find common solutions. Whether this is a temporary alliance or a more lasting strategic shift will depend on the future of global leadership and the evolving relationship between the U.S., China, and the EU.
Conclusion
Donald Trump’s tariff policies, which initially seemed to target global adversaries, had an unintended consequence: they forced two of the world’s largest geopolitical players, China and the EU, into a cooperative relationship. As both the EU and China sought to counter the economic pressure exerted by U.S. tariffs, they found that working together not only made sense economically but also allowed them to assert a greater influence on the future of global trade and diplomacy.
The evolving relationship between China and the EU demonstrates the complex and dynamic nature of global trade. Tariffs, rather than dividing the world, can sometimes serve as a catalyst for unlikely partnerships, forcing nations to reevaluate their alliances and find common ground in the face of shared challenges. While the future of this relationship remains uncertain, it is clear that Trump’s tariff threats have already had a lasting impact on global geopolitics.
