Storm of Protest from Startups After Minister Piyush Goyal’s ‘Dukaandari’ Jibe
In a significant turn of events, the Indian startup ecosystem found itself in the midst of a storm of protests after Union Minister Piyush Goyal made controversial remarks about the startup sector during a speech at a recent event. The Minister, known for his sharp and often outspoken opinions, referred to the growing trend of startups as “dukaandari,” a term that loosely translates to “small-scale trading” or “small businesses.” His words sparked immediate outrage among startup founders, entrepreneurs, investors, and industry bodies, igniting debates on the role of startups in India’s economy, the perception of their business models, and their contribution to the nation’s growth.
Goyal’s remark, intended as a critique of the increasing number of startups that appear to be operating on small margins, focusing on low-cost models, or offering basic goods and services, was perceived as an attack on the innovative spirit of India’s burgeoning entrepreneurial ecosystem. The term ‘dukaandari’ sent shockwaves through the startup community, which has been pivotal in driving innovation, generating employment, and contributing to the country’s economic growth.
In this article, we will explore the controversy that erupted following Piyush Goyal’s statement, the reactions from various stakeholders in the startup ecosystem, and the broader implications of such remarks on India’s entrepreneurial landscape.
The ‘Dukaandari’ Jibe: A Critique or Insult?
The remarks were made during an event where Piyush Goyal, who holds the portfolio of Union Minister of Commerce and Industry, Consumer Affairs, Food & Public Distribution, and Textiles, spoke about India’s economic vision. Goyal, in his speech, referred to the trend of certain businesses operating at small scales and criticized them for mimicking “traditional shops” rather than promoting the growth of innovative and scalable businesses that could have a wider impact on the economy.
The term ‘dukaandari’, in the context of his statement, implied that many startups were simply rehashing old business ideas or operating at a limited scale. It suggested that instead of contributing to the larger industrial or technological growth of India, these ventures were just like “small shops,” offering basic products or services without the potential for long-term sustainability, innovation, or economic growth.
While Goyal’s statement may have been meant to address businesses that focus on low-margin goods and services, it landed heavily on the broader startup community, which felt that the remark unfairly lumped all startups together, without recognizing the diversity of innovation, technology, and job creation that the sector offers. To many, the term was seen not just as a critique but as a dismissive dismissal of the hard work and vision that entrepreneurs put into building their businesses.
A Backlash from the Startup Community
The fallout from Goyal’s remarks was swift and fierce. Startups, industry veterans, and investors took to social media platforms, business forums, and news outlets to express their frustration and disappointment. The crux of the protest centered around the perception that Goyal’s comment reflected a lack of understanding of the challenges and realities that startups face in India.
Startups Respond with Outrage
Entrepreneurs across the country were quick to voice their anger over what they saw as a lack of appreciation for the struggles of small businesses and the entrepreneurs who have been driving change in India’s economy. Nitin Gupta, co-founder of a prominent fintech startup, posted on Twitter: “It’s insulting to call our efforts ‘dukaandari.’ We are not just running shops; we are innovating and creating jobs for thousands.”
Another founder, Richa Agarwal, who runs a sustainable fashion startup, criticized Goyal for undermining the role of startups in driving new ideas and economic growth. She wrote, “Startups today are making huge contributions in sectors like technology, healthcare, and renewable energy. These are not small businesses or ‘dukaandari’ operations, but global ventures with the power to change the world.”
The sentiment was echoed by many others, who pointed out that India’s startup ecosystem has grown significantly over the last decade. In 2024 alone, India saw over 1,200 new startups, bringing the total number of recognized startups to more than 50,000. Many of these startups have raised significant capital, become unicorns (startups valued at over $1 billion), and attracted global attention from investors and consumers alike.
Industry Bodies and Investors Weigh In
In addition to entrepreneurs, prominent industry bodies like the Startup India initiative, which is part of the Government of India’s efforts to foster entrepreneurship, expressed concern over the Minister’s comments. The initiative, which has been working towards providing mentorship, financial support, and a favorable policy environment for startups, responded by saying that “startups are at the heart of innovation and job creation in India and should not be reduced to small-scale shops.”
Even angel investors and venture capitalists, who have supported startups in their early stages and helped fuel India’s growing startup economy, voiced their dissatisfaction with the minister’s remarks. Ravi Mehta, an angel investor and founder of a well-known venture fund, stated, “We’ve invested in startups that are revolutionizing industries like artificial intelligence, space tech, and clean energy. To categorize these efforts as ‘dukaandari’ is not just inaccurate but also discouraging for entrepreneurs who are working hard to build scalable and sustainable businesses.”
Radhika Gupta, CEO of a leading asset management firm and an advocate for women entrepreneurs, also joined the chorus of disapproval. She shared on her social media platforms, “The startup ecosystem is one of the most important engines of economic growth in India. Our entrepreneurs are tackling some of the world’s biggest problems—‘dukaandari’ is the last thing they deserve to be called.”
Public and Media Reactions
The media coverage surrounding the statement was extensive, with news outlets covering the protests and debates that erupted in response to the Minister’s words. Several news outlets published opinion pieces and articles examining how Goyal’s comments could potentially damage India’s reputation as a hub for innovation and entrepreneurship.
Many media outlets also pointed out that the Minister’s remark came at a time when India is trying to position itself as a global leader in the startup space, attracting foreign investors and facilitating the growth of technology-driven businesses. The suggestion that India’s startup culture was based on “small-scale” businesses contradicted the government’s own policies designed to support entrepreneurship and innovation.
Is This a Clash of Visions for India’s Economy?
The controversy raises larger questions about the Indian government’s vision for the future of its economy. The comments made by Piyush Goyal seem to highlight a growing divide between those in power who view business through the lens of traditional industries, and the startup community that sees itself as the driver of the new economy—one built on innovation, technology, and scalable business models.
On the one hand, traditional sectors like manufacturing, agriculture, and retail are seen as the backbone of India’s economy, providing employment and contributing significantly to the nation’s GDP. On the other hand, startups are often seen as disruptive forces, challenging old business models and creating new markets.
Startups in India have made significant strides in areas such as financial technology (fintech), e-commerce, healthcare, artificial intelligence, electric mobility, and more. Many have succeeded not just by selling products but by offering innovative solutions that address pressing issues in society, such as financial inclusion, access to healthcare, and sustainability.
Table of Contents
The Road Ahead: A Call for Dialogue and Understanding
In the wake of this controversy, it is clear that more communication and dialogue are needed between the government and the startup community. The protest from startups after the ‘dukaandari’ jibe reflects a larger disconnect that needs to be addressed if India is to fully leverage its startup ecosystem to fuel economic growth.
While critics of Goyal’s remarks argue that startups should be celebrated for their role in driving innovation and creating employment, the minister’s statement might also serve as a wake-up call for entrepreneurs to ensure that their ventures remain sustainable, innovative, and scalable in the long run. After all, the startup ecosystem must balance innovation with economic value creation to ensure that it continues to grow and contribute to the nation’s economy in a meaningful way.
Conclusion: Understanding the Power of Startups
In conclusion, while Piyush Goyal’s remarks were controversial and sparked outrage, they also provide an opportunity for introspection within the startup ecosystem. It is essential that both the government and the entrepreneurial community come together to understand and support each other’s efforts.
For now, the storm of protest from startups serves as a reminder that innovation and entrepreneurship should be appreciated for their role in shaping India’s future. Startups are not just small shops or “dukaandari”; they are driving change, creating jobs, and transforming industries in ways that will shape the global economy for years to come.
