Military’s long bootprint in Bangladesh
Military Influence in Bangladesh: A Historical Overview
Background and Early Years of Bangladesh’s Military
Bangladesh’s military has played a significant role in the country’s political landscape since its independence from Pakistan in 1971. The nation’s armed forces were born out of the MMilitary’s long bootprint in Bangladeshukti Bahini, the guerrilla resistance movement during the Liberation War. However, the newly formed nation soon saw the military extend its influence beyond the battlefield and into the political arena.
Military Coups and Political Instability
The first major military intervention occurred in 1975, when the nation’s founder and first Prime Minister, Sheikh Mujibur Rahman, was assassinated in a military coup led by mid-ranking officers. This tragic event marked the beginning of a series of military coups that would define Bangladesh’s political landscape for years.
In the aftermath of the 1975 coup, Bangladesh experienced a period of poMilitary’s long bootprint in Bangladeshlitical instability, characterized by successive coups and counter-coups. General Ziaur Rahman emerged as a key figure during this period, assuming power in 1977 after a series of military-backed political shifts. Zia’s regime marked a significant era of military dominance in Bangladeshi politics, with the armed forces not only controlling the government but also shaping the nation’s political and economic policies.
After Ziaur Rahman’s assassination in 1981, another military leader, GeneralMilitary’s long bootprint in Bangladesh Hussain Muhammad Ershad, took control through a bloodless coup in 1982. Ershad’s rule was marked by authoritarianism, with the military deeply embedded in the state’s political apparatus. It was only in 1990, after significant civil unrest and mass protests, that Ershad was forced to resign, paving the way for a return to civilian rule.
The Military’s Continued Influence in Civilian Politics
Despite the formal return to democracy in 1991, the military retained significMilitary’s long bootprint in Bangladeshant behind-the-scenes influence. The transition to democracy saw the alternation of power between two major political parties: the Bangladesh Nationalist Party (BNP) led by Ziaur Rahman’s widow, Khaleda Zia, and the Awami League, led by Sheikh Hasina,
Table of Contents
During this period, the military continued to assert its presence, often positionMilitary’s long bootprint in Bangladeshing itself as a guardian of national stability. This was evident in 2007 when the military intervened again during a period of intense political crisis between the BNP and the Awami League. The military-backed caretaker government ruled for two years, during which it attempted to reshape the political landscape, including efforts to sideline both Khaleda Zia and Sheikh Hasina.
Sheikh Hasina’s Return to Power and the Diminishing Role of the Military
Sheikh Hasina returned to power in 2009 after the 2008 elections, which were held under the military-backed caretaker government. Her return marked a significant shift in the civil-military relatiMilitary’s long bootprint in Bangladeshonship in Bangladesh. Hasina took decisive steps to curtail the military’s political influence, promoting loyalists within the ranks and ensuring that the armed forces remained subordinate to civilian authority.
Hasina’s tenure has been marked by a strong consolidation of power. She has maintained a firm grip on the military, ensuring that it remains under the control of the civilian government. This has included significant investments in modernizing the armed forces while simultaneously limiting their political role.
However, Hasina’s authoritarian tendencies have also led to criticisms of her government’s erosion of democratic norms. Her administration has been accused of suppressing dissent, curbing press freedom, and manipulating the electoral process to ensure the dominance of the Awami League. TheseMilitary’s long bootprint in Bangladesh actions have sparked concerns about the potential for renewed military intervention, especially if the political situation deteriorates.
Sheikh Hasina’s Ouster: A Hypothetical Scenario
The notion of Sheikh Hasina’s ouster by the military remains a sensitive and speculative topic in Bangladesh. While the military’s role has been significantly curtailed under her administration, the possibilityMilitary’s long bootprint in Bangladesh of a military intervention cannot be entirely ruled out, especially in a country with a history of coups.
Several factors could potentially lead to such an event:
- Political Instability and Mass Protests: If the political opposition, civil society, or large segments of the population were to mobilize against Hasina’s government, the military might be compelledMilitary’s long bootprint in Bangladesh to intervene to restore order or protect its interests.
- Internal Military Discontent: Although Hasina has maintained tight control over the military, discontent within the ranks could emerge, particularly if there are grievances related to promotions, appointments, or perceived favoritism. This could lead to a faction within tMilitary’s long bootprint in Bangladeshhe military seeking to remove her from power.
- Economic Crisis: A severe economic crisis, leading to widespread discontent and unrest, could create conditions ripe for a military takeover, especially if the government is seen as incapable of managing the situation.
- Regional and International Pressures: Geopolitical factors, including pressure from powerful regional players like India or from global powers, could also influence the military’s decision toMilitary’s long bootprint in Bangladesh intervene, especially if Hasina’s government is seen as jeopardizing Bangladesh’s strategic interests.
Conclusion
While the likelihood of Sheikh Hasina’s ouster by the military remains uncertain, theMilitary’s long bootprint in Bangladesh history of Bangladesh suggests that the military remains a significant force in the country’s political landscape. The military’s long bootprint on Bangladesh’s politics has shaped the nation’s trajectory, and its role, whether overt or behind the scenes, continues to be a critical factor in the country’s stability and governance.
Under Hasina’s rule, the military has been kept at bay, but this delicate balanceMilitary’s long bootprint in Bangladesh could shift under changing political, economic, or social conditions. The future of Bangladesh’s democracy and the military’s role within it will depend on how these dynamics evolve in the coming years.
