Sudhir Mishra on Adolescence No. 1 Spot: ‘Violates Every Rule of …’
Renowned filmmaker Sudhir Mishra has sparked a heated discussion in the Indian film industry after expressing his surprise at the Netflix India chart-topping success of Adolescence. The film, which has been trending at #1 on the platform, has received mixed reviews, with audiences and critics divided over its unconventional storytelling. Mishra, known for his critically acclaimed films that challenge cinematic norms, took to social media to voice his thoughts, calling the film an anomaly in contemporary storytelling.
Mishra’s Critique: A Film That Defies Convention?
Mishra’s candid remarks on Adolescence highlight his concerns about what he perceives as a lack of structured storytelling. “It violates every rule of bad script writing,” he commented, suggesting that the film manages to break fundamental cinematic principles yet still captivates audiences. Further elaborating on his stance, he stated, “Indians are not supposed to like it. This is not the kind of film that traditionally appeals to mainstream audiences here.”
In traditional filmmaking, certain elements such as character development, narrative progression, and logical coherence are considered essential. However, Adolescence seemingly defies these conventions, relying instead on a fragmented narrative, abrupt tonal shifts, and experimental cinematography. The question Mishra raises is whether this defiance of conventional storytelling is what makes it popular or if the audience’s evolving taste is embracing unpredictability in filmmaking.
The Success of Adolescence: What Works?
Despite Mishra’s skepticism, Adolescence has clearly resonated with Indian audiences, leading to its #1 ranking on Netflix. Several factors could explain its popularity:
- Relatable Themes – The film delves into the complexities of youth, exploring themes of rebellion, love, anxiety, and self-discovery. This emotional depth connects strongly with younger audiences.
- Experimental Storytelling – Unlike formulaic Bollywood narratives, Adolescence takes creative risks, offering an unpredictable and immersive experience.
- Strong Performances – The cast, particularly the lead actors, has been praised for their raw and authentic portrayals.
- Social Media Buzz – The film’s ambiguous ending and discussion-worthy moments have led to online debates, making it a trending topic.
Breaking the ‘Rules’ of Scriptwriting
Mishra’s critique begs the question: What are the rules of bad scriptwriting, and has Adolescence truly violated them? Traditionally, bad scriptwriting is characterized by:
- Weak Character Arcs – Characters lacking depth or clear motivations.
- Inconsistent Pacing – A narrative that either drags or moves too fast without emotional buildup.
- Plot Holes & Incoherence – Illogical story developments that confuse the audience.
- Overuse of Clichés – Reliance on predictable tropes that fail to surprise.
While some critics argue that Adolescence exhibits some of these traits, others believe the film intentionally subverts conventional storytelling, challenging audiences to engage with it on a deeper level.
The Debate Over Modern Storytelling
Mishra’s comments have ignited a larger debate about the evolution of storytelling in Indian cinema. Some filmmakers believe that structured narratives are essential, while others argue that modern audiences are willing to embrace ambiguity, non-linear plots, and experimental techniques.
Streaming platforms like Netflix have played a significant role in this shift. Unlike traditional theatrical releases, where commercial viability often dictates creative choices, OTT platforms offer filmmakers greater flexibility to experiment with unconventional storytelling methods. This allows films like Adolescence to find success despite their departure from mainstream norms.
Filmmakers & Critics Weigh In
Following Mishra’s comments, several industry insiders and critics have weighed in on the discussion. While some agree with his critique, others defend the film’s artistic choices:
- Anurag Kashyap, known for his gritty, unconventional films, stated, “Audiences are evolving. If Adolescence is resonating, it’s because people want something fresh.”
- A mainstream Bollywood writer, who wished to remain anonymous, said, “Yes, there are flaws, but the film has an emotional core that people connect with. That’s what really matters.”
- Critics from various platforms have given the film mixed-to-positive reviews, with many noting its unique approach as a double-edged sword.
Conclusion: A Cinematic Shift or an Anomaly?
Mishra’s criticism of Adolescence brings to light a critical conversation about the direction of Indian cinema. While some see its success as a sign of storytelling innovation, others worry that it reflects a decline in narrative discipline. Regardless of the divided opinions, one fact remains clear: Adolescence has struck a chord with viewers, proving that sometimes, breaking the rules might just be the formula for success.
As audience preferences continue to evolve, so too will the definition of what makes a film ‘good’ or ‘bad.’ Whether Mishra’s critique sparks change or merely adds to the debate, one thing is certain—Indian cinema is in an era of transformation, and all eyes are on what comes next.
